Explainable, defendable scoring you can count on
AI backed by evidence and explained with transparency, because black box LLM scoring isn’t interpretable for high quality hiring.
Designed to be explainable, unlike an LLM.
“Strong in patient care” or “weak in critical thinking” is not good enough to explain why a candidate was hired or not.
HiringBranch’s proprietary taxonomy and automatic scoring maps candidate behaviour to specific actions observed during their assessment. This allows the AI to produce job-relevant feedback that can be easily explained.
The candidate acknowledged and paraphrased well the customers' issues and offered suitable resolutions. Spoken fluency stayed steady with minor hesitation under pressure. Written follow-up was clear and correctly punctuated.
Score breakdowns
Understand nuance between candidates with controlled, interpretable scoring.
How explainability works
Scoring is controlled and interpretable end-to-end, from the moment a candidate speaks to the moment a recruiter opens the report.
Scored in real time
Explained instantly
Stored for defensibility
From our science team to you
Frequently Asked Questions
An inferred skill is a guess based on proxy signals: a resume keyword, a job title, a confident answer in an unstructured interview, or a personality quiz result. A verified skill is one a candidate has actually demonstrated, in context, against a defined standard, with evidence attached to show how they demonstrated it. HiringBranch only verifies skills, never infers skills.
With performance correlations. The HiringBranch Standard is a global benchmark for language, communication, interpersonal and cognitive skills. Every score is validated against real on-the-job performance outcomes. A percentile tells you exactly where a candidate stands in comparison to peers, not just whether they passed.
The global percentile is grouped by role and skill competency. You will find percentiles against a candidate’s overall score (compared to every other candidate globally who was assessed for the same role) and competency score (compared to every other candidate in any role who was assessed for that competency e.g. cognitive skills, speaking fluency, etc.).
It means every skill score a candidate receives comes with a clear, evidence-based explanation, not just a number. HiringBranch's explainability summary shows the specific parts of a candidate's role play response that drove their score, tied to a defined skill competency, so recruiters always know why a score is what it is.
That is up to the employer. By default, explainability summaries and score breakdowns are built into the candidate profile your hiring team reviews only. Should an employer wish to share results with candidates, that is up to them.
Most "explainable AI" in hiring today is a general-purpose LLM that renders a verdict, then a second AI layer bolted on to write a paragraph justifying it after the fact. HiringBranch's scoring is different: our proprietary and native AI is acoustic- and linguistics-based and purpose-built for skills measurement, so the score was never a black box to begin with. There's no LLM-as-a-judge to explain away, only structured, transparent, deterministic scoring against pre-defined skill competencies.
No, it gives recruiters better information to use their judgement with. Explainability summaries turn a raw score into a plain-language report recruiters can review, compare across candidates, and retain for later, so hiring teams spend their time interviewing proven top candidates instead of guessing at what an AI score actually means.
Every hiring decision depends on accurate assessments
Get scores you can count on. Book a demo to see explainable scoring in action.





